Contents
Contents
Editorial - 3
LINGUISTIC HUMAN RIGHTS
Robert Phillipson and Tove Skutnabb-Kangas
Linguistic Rights and
Wrongs - 5
Linguistic human rights are
analyzed as one type of human rights, reflecting an inalienable norm. Rights
are needed for speakers of dominated languages, who individually and
collectively experience linguistic ‘wrongs’, marginalisation, and ultimately
the extinction of the languages.
The article of Robert Phillipson and Tove
Skutnabb-Kangas seeks to clarify the contours, scope and potential of the
concept linguistic human rights. It considers to what extent language rights
are well protected in existing supranational human rights covenants, at the
‘universal’ and ‘European’ levels, and in an example of recent state
legislation aimed at empowering an indigenous people. It considers why the
issue of linguistic human rights should be of concern to applied linguistics,
and argues for the formulation and ratification of a Universal Declaration of
Linguistic Human Rights.
The starting-point of the authors is that
is axiomatic that: a) linguistic rights are one type of human rights; b)
depriving people of their human rights leads to conflict.
Fernand de Varennes
Equality and
Non-Discrimination:
Fundamental Principles of Minority
Languages Rights - 22
In the opinion of the
author, human rights today are more than an ‘interesting idea’: they constitute
an integral part of the moral fabric of the international community to which
Europe and its constituent States belong. But because the appearance of
international human rights is a relatively young phenomenon in historical
terms, it also means that every aspect of their application is fully understood
or appreciated. This is especially true for issues involving minorities,
including use of language. There is a continuing process going on to define
more clearly how various international human rights standards, such as freedom
of expression and non-discrimination, among others, may affect the private and
public use of language by persons belonging to minorities, as well as
government language restrictions or preferences. This process finds inspiration
in values of tolerance, coexistence and integration that are part of the very
foundation of a modern democratic State.
Distinctions that represent
a proportionate balance between the different interests are seen in
international law as being reasonable, and therefore not discriminatory.
However, this means that if a State language preference or restrictions is
’unreasonable’, such as when the government refuses to provide public services
in regions and localities where persons belonging to a national minority are
present in significant numbers, then such a language distinction is
discriminatory and unacceptable.
In general, and so far as
possible, policy and law should be elaborated and applied with a view to
ensuring full and equal opportunities for all persons, including persons
belonging to linguistic minorities.
Marya DuMont
Minority
Sociolinguistics in Europe:
The Occitan Language vs. the French
State - 33
Despite a worldwide movement towards
modernity and its concomitant purported elimination of interpersonal and ethnic
differences in the wake of economic efficiency, the ubiquity of ethnic and
linguistic minority movements is striking. The frequency of language use as a
symbol of ethnicity is also clear; the great number of human languages, coupled
with a remarkably low number of linguistically homogenous states, yields a
global prevalence of linguistic minorities, many of whom are bent on demanding
autonomy on the basis of their distinctive languages.
Within the geographical territory of
France, despite its confident projection of linguistic unity, at least seven
groups (Alsacien, Basque, Breton, Catalan, Corsican, Flemish and Occitan) might
claim legitimacy as indigenous linguistic and cultural minorities. France’s
particularly stringent monolingualism points to a unique need for justification
of ethnic demands in terms of internationally recognized rights to one’s
‘mother tongue’; it thus comes as little surprise that the Occitan movement has
sought to further its demands largely in terms of language rights.
By the author, the demands of linguistic
minorities do not, however, necessarily extend as far as independence or
secession. Nonetheless, western European nation-states, especially France, fear
the ‘Balkanization of Europe; they maintain that if they were to grant autonomy
to each minority that presented its claims on the national government, the
resultant political instability among so many splinter states would be ripe for
continued conflict.
ANALYSIS
Mihai Chioveanu
From the Racial State to the Final
Solution - 62
In spite of more than a half a century
distance from the tragic events of the Second World War and from the significant
number of published studies, the Holocaust continues to remain one of the big
‘mysteries’ of history. The same thing can be said about historiography where,
by the particularly sensitive nature of the subject, due if not mostly, but
anyway considerably to the motivations and political stakes based on various
reasons, it has imposed, sadly almost permanently, limits to the researcher
preoccupied with study of the events and/or the undertaking of theoretical
analysis.
Mihai Chioveanu’s study proposes in the
first place a brief approach of the main theories developed around the
Holocaust, its scholasticism and finally, a general presentation of the
evolution of this subject in the western political and academical life.
DIALOGUE
Tîrgu-Mureş — March 2000 - 73
Between 23-24 March, in the
framework of the sixth edition of Week of Tolerance, organized by the
Intercultural Centre of the Pro Europa League, had taken place the debate
’Tîrgu-Mureş — March 2000’, dedicated to the analyses of the interethnic
conflict from March ’90 in Tîrgu-Mureş.
Prestigious personalities of the
Romanian-Hungarian dialogue from Romania and Hungary presented their address
regarding the causes, consequences and moral of the tragic event.
DOCUMENT
Universal Declaration of
Linguistic Rights - 108
As it is stated in the
Declaration — signed by numerous institutions and nongovernmental organizations
— in the Preamble, the situation of each language is the result of the
convergence and interaction of a wide range of factors of a political and
legal, ideological and historical, demographic and territorial, economic and
social, cultural, linguistic and sociolinguistic, interlinguistic and
subjective nature. Language communities are currently threatened by a lack of
self-government, a limited population or one that is partially or wholly
dispersed, a fragile economy, an uncodified language, or a cultural model
opposed to the dominant one, which make it impossible for many languages to
survive and develop unless the following basic goals are taken into account: a)
In a political perspective, the goal of conceiving a way of organizing
linguistic diversity so as to permit the effective participation of language
communities in this new growth model; b) In a cultural perspective, the goal of
rendering the worldwide communications space compatible with the equitable
participation of all peoples, language communities and individuals in the
development process; c) In an economic perspective, the goal of fostering
sustainable development based on the participation of all and on respect for
the ecological balance of societies and for equitable relationships between all
languages and cultures. For all these reasons, the Declaration takes language
communities and not states as its point of departure and is to be viewed in the
context of the reinforcement of international institutions capable of
guaranteeing sustainable and equitable development for the whole of humanity.
For these reasons also it aims to encourage the creation of a political
framework for linguistic diversity based upon respect, harmonious coexistence
and mutual benefit.
István Haller
A Document of Reference - 121
The article offers a
comparison between the Universal Declaration of Linguistic Rights and other
international documents that guarantees the respect of linguistical rights.
Case
study
Eugen
Patraş
The Romanian Community in
Ukraine - 125
The study analyses the
situation of Romanians in Ukraine. The authors’s conclusion states that the
Romanian minority from Ukraine, inspite of the fact that is an autochtonous
minority and is the second largest, after the Russians, between the country’s
minorities, it has been subject of political, economical, social, cultural and
national marginalisation during the totalitarian soviet regime, and also after
1990, had facing a methodical discrimination against the majority, or sometimes
against other minorities, numerically almost equal with them. All these
failures create the premises of forced assimilation, against the will of the
members of the community.
TRANSYLVANIAN CONVERGENCIES
Constantin Iordachi and Marius Turda
Political Reconciliation versus Historical Speech: the
Perception of Hungary in the Romanian Historiography,
1989-1999 - 153
The fall of the communism
and the end of the cold war, as well as the general political democratization
and integration process in the economical and Western security institution,
generated a more and more intense political collaboration of the states from
Central and South-Eastern Europe. In spite of all these, the transformation of
identity and reconstruction of social imaginary in this region does not provoke
yet considerable changes in the perception of the other: the myths, prejudices
and negative stereotypes, as well the symbolically exclusion of some states
belonging to the former communist block from Europe, preempted as an
elitist-exclusivist and normativ-hegemonic political concept, continues to
characterize the mental collective geographies from Central and South-Eastern
Europe.
The study follows the changes suffered by
the interpretation of Hungary’s history in the Romanian historiography in the
last decade, trying to explore some components of Hungary’s imagine in the
Romanian academic space. The Romanian-Hungarian state relations in the last
decade had cross a spectacular politically evolution, from an intense diplomacy
conflict to cooperation şi political-military partnership. Surpassing the acute
ideological confrontation regarding the statute of the Hungarian minority in Romania
in the second part of the eighteens, the interethnic violence from Tirgu-Mureş
in 1990, as well as the lack of political contacts in the years 1990-1994,
Romania and Hungary constructed, starting with 1996, a mechanism of political
reconciliation and partnership, unanimously considered as ’a model for Europe
and the whole world’.
RESTITUTIO
Mihály Sebestyén-Spielmann
Contributions to the
History of Printeries in the 18th Century.
The Case of Transylvania - 175
The study intends to be a
contribution to the knowledge about the printing and editorial activity in
Transylvania throughout the whole century.
Among the years 1701-1800 there had been
functioning printing presses in fourteen localities from Transylvania; the 39
printeries have published 4073 titles; namely an average of 40 titles per year.
The author is analyzing these publications
pointing out that in the 18th century there has been in progress a mature
editorial activity.
REVIEWS
Cornelia Cistelecan
A Historical Destiny: The Romanian Unit
Church - 188